Most debates concerning immigration typically involve issues
of employment, toleration, or criminality, but what about preserving American
culture? In an age of multiculturalism
and relativism, this important issue often finds itself on the back
burner. While America
may be a “land of immigrants,” the United States has always had
immigration restrictions, as the Founding Fathers intended, to preserve the
American identity.
Did the rich white slave owners of old want to ensure that
only the WASPs prospered in America? No.
They were more concerned about developing a citizenry in America that
would support the republican government they fought to establish. A republic, ruled by free men for the benefit
of its citizens, requires a cohesive society to peaceably operate. America today has greater
resemblance to an empire with large groups of segregated people, lacking a
common culture, ruled by a powerful government.
George Washington wrote in 1794, “the policy or advantage of
[immigration] taking place in a body (I mean the settling of them in a body)
may be much questioned; for, by so doing, they retain the language, habits, and
principles (good or bad) which they bring with them. Whereas by an intermixture
with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs,
measures, and laws: in a word, soon become one people.”
With the complete breakdown of American culture in recent
decades, one might think that immigrants have had no problems assimilating
because there’s no strong sense of identity even among the natives. Supporters of illegal immigration hope to
further erode the American identity, and transplant all of Mexico into our
south and southwest states. The Aztlan
movement further hopes to defeat “White America,” eliminate the border between
the U.S. and Mexico,
and “reclaim” all the southwest states for the Latino people.
Thomas Jefferson warned about such a problem in 1787: “Suppose
20 millions of republican Americans thrown all of a sudden into France, what
would be the condition of that kingdom? If it would be more turbulent, less
happy, less strong, we may believe that the addition of half a million of
foreigners to our present numbers would produce a similar effect here.”
Such foreign factions, like the millions of illegals in America today,
hinder the operation of government and the stability of society because they
are not familiar with its culture and history.
I seriously doubt that the large population of illegal Hispanics, many
of whom don’t speak English, have studied John Locke, Aristotle, Cicero,
American history, and the Declaration of
Independence. But then again, most
American’s haven’t either.
The Founders knew the dangers of factions. Alexander Hamilton wrote about factions in Federalist 10, and George Washington
spoke about them as President.
Throughout his presidency, Washington
extolled unity among the American people as a pillar of citizenship. One can only read that sentence today and
chuckle, or cry, with such sharp divisions among the American people.
Now there’s no problem with having different opinions on how
to tackle problems, or in differing from others in personal habits or
preferences, but divisions about the purpose and role of the government, and
what constitutes the ethos of its people, can be very dangerous.
Samuel Huntington writes that the American creed made of the
principles of liberty, equality, individualism, representative government, and
private property developed in early America out of common cultural elements
including the Christian religion, Protestant values and moralism, a work ethic,
the English language, British traditions of law, justice and the limits of
government power, and a legacy of European art, literature, philosophy, and
music.
The new American creed seems to be made up of socialism,
forced equality, and oligarchy based on the “culture” of tolerance, relativism,
multiculturalism, and disseverance from religion.
Though it is very difficult to protect our long borders, and
would be extremely difficult to expel the millions of illegal immigrants from
our country, the main purpose of our government is to protect its people. First and foremost, our sovereign borders must
be protected, and the integrity of our society must be protected to secure the
prosperity of the American people and their government.
So far the government has failed to offer protection
on either of these fronts, and all the Presidential candidates seem happy to
continue in these failures. While our
politicians focus on the wars abroad, what about the wars at home? We must not forget that the greatest powers
in history fell to ruins not from external threats, but from internal strife
and divisions.
Comments